EYE FOR IMAGE
WORDSPIN
BLOG

EYE FOR IMAGE

Svanemøllevej 25
DK-2100 Copenhagen
Tel.: +45 4492 4444
Fax.: +45 4492 4441
contact(at)eye-for-image.com

Eye for Image Blog

Author Archive

Spelling mistakes can hurt

Monday, August 11th, 2008

At Eye for Image, we see spelling mistakes every day. Some make us cringe, others make us laugh. We cringed and laughed when we saw the job title “Pubic Sector Analyst.” Ooops. Even spellcheck wouldn’t help with that one.

But can you just imagine you are a Public Sector Analyst? You’re at a meeting. You’ve just given out your business cards to each of the 10 people at the table. Then you notice the missing letter ‘l’ in your job title. How on earth do you recover from that one???

Spelling. For some, it’s a cinch. For others, it’s a minefield. It’s one of the very first things we begin to learn at school, and we keep on learning as long as we are reading and writing. Oh, how spellcheck programs have simplified our lives! But those pesky misspellings show up anyway.

Our recent WordSpin article on misspellings in English lists 16 common ones. Check it out and see if you learn something new.

Got a memorable spelling mistake yourself? Post a comment on this blog entry and let us know what it was. We promise to laugh with you, not at you!



What’s wrong with asking for unsolicited applications?

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

In Denmark, “You are welcome to send an unsolicited application” is used quite a bit – but few feel comfortable with it. Quite often, our clients ask us: Is unsolicited application the right term to use? Will people understand it? What can we say instead?

So we decided to write a WordSpin article on this topic, suggesting possible - and friendlier? - alternatives. Check out This month’s questionable phrase: unsolicited applications.

What does your company use? Do you have a great alternative to unsolicited applications that you’d like to share? We’d love to hear your thoughts!



Er vi on the right track i debatten om den engelske influence på det danske sprog?

Monday, June 9th, 2008

Der er i øjeblikket en heftig debat i gang blandt kommunikatører om, hvorvidt det danske sprog er ved at blive oversvømmet og udvandet af engelske ord. Uden at gå for meget i detaljer omkring, hvor jeg selv står i den diskussion, vil jeg gerne dele en lille anekdote med jer.

Jeg deltog for nylig i en konference, hvor en masse dygtige danske forretningsfolk gav vi andre dødelige et indblik i, hvordan de arbejder med markedsføring og kommunikation. Eventen “in itself” vil nok ikke gå over i historien for mig, men flere af talerne gjorde dybt indtryk med deres brug af flotte engelske ord!

Jeg har derfor opdigtet en lille tekst, der ikke har direkte relation til det, en af talerne i virkeligheden delte med sit publikum. Men samtlige engelske ord i min tekst indgik rent faktisk i vedkommendes ”danske” indlæg. Enjoy!

En lille exercice
“I denne lille exercice vil jeg tage jer med på en tur gennem det danske sprogs mange nye opportunities – et indspark til debatten om de mange engelske ord, der hver dag sniger sig ind i det danske business-language.

For at se, om vi er on track, kan vi foretage forskellige actions for at måle det danske sprogs performance ude i den virkelige business-verden. Man kunne for eksempel starte med at opstille en execution liste og outline en workstream, så vi er sikre på at få det hele med. Det giver os mulighed for at predicte på, hvor mange engelske ord, der sniger sig ind i f.eks. danske business blogs, websites eller one-pagere.

Når vi så har handled analyserne og løbende har tjekket op på vores KPI’er, så vil de fremkomne charts formentlig give os et view på, om vi har nået vores targets. Resultatet vil uden tvivl vise, at det danske sprog ikke længere er aligned med det sprog, man talte for bare et par år siden, da den engelske influence var noget mindre. Vi er nået way past common-sense stadiet, og jeg tror, at der skal sættes nogle drivers i gang, så vi ikke ender med totalt at out-spende vores kvote af tilladte engelske ord per tekst i det danske sprog.

Hvad er vores learning?
Vores learning må være, at vi hver dag når nye milestones med vores sprog – og at vi dermed løber nogle risks for ikke at kunne benchmarke sproget og skabe ækvivalenter til de mange engelske business terms…”



Not as scary as it seems!

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

A blog is only interesting if you’ve got something to say – something you think is important enough to share with your audience. So when it comes to corporate blogging, the goal must be to blog about topics of interest to the customers – and preferably to get them to comment get into a dialogue.

We know that many of our customers read our blog, but very few actually comment. This goes particularly for the Danish part of our audience. Why is that?

- Because we write in English?
- Because it’s hard to find the time?
- Because the topics aren’t relevant?
- Because the idea of blogging and displaying one’s opinion to the public still takes some getting used to for many people?

Some people are natural bloggers and quickly latch onto a debate. Others are simply not. Even our staff of international copywriters is split into two groups – the bloggers and “the others”. I’m one of “the others”, and the above reasons have kept me from blogging and from commenting on others’ blogs, even though I’ve found the topics really interesting.

However, having written two blog entries now, I’ve come to realize that blogging isn’t as scary as it seems. I might even comment on a blog entry sometime soon!

What are your reasons?
So – to all of you out there who read our blog, but don’t comment: what are your reasons? I’d love to hear them – I know now that mine weren’t half as good as I thought…



Corporate blogging – a waste of time?

Friday, March 28th, 2008

Berlingske Business recently pointed out how few PR agencies have a Corporate Blog - something they all strongly recommend to their clients. One of their arguments against corporate blogging is lack of time – another is that it’s hard to find something relevant to write about.

These were also our fears when we decided to set up a corporate blog about a year ago. And yes, one year’s experience with our blog has shown us that it does take some time to get it rolling, to find the “corporate blogging voice” and to catch people’s attention.

But the fact is that now that our blog is up and running, even our most regular bloggers hardly ever spend more than 30 minutes a week on the blog. Now, it’s true that we’re professional copywriters and writing is our thing. But even so, our staff is split into two groups – the bloggers and “the others”. Some people are natural bloggers and quickly latch onto a debate – others are simply not.

I believe that every company or agency has at least one natural born blogger. And that every company has something interesting to share with it’s stakeholders. An opinion on where the industry is going. Comments on new products or ideas. The blog is a great place for your audience to get to meet the “real people” behind the corporate facade – and they would like to hear what you have to say. So maybe it’s worth investing 30 minutes a week sharing your thoughts and ideas with your audience?

So grab your pens (keyboards) and BLOG ON! Of course you’ve got something relevant to say. So say it. Out loud – and proud.





Authors
  • Aaron Bateman
  • Anastasya Partan
  • Chris Ramsden
  • Dan Elloway
  • David Hoskin
  • Fiona Tod
  • Jonathan Winch
  • Kathryn Casey
  • Nathalie Erb
  • Nisha Sethi

  • Categories
  • Business
  • Communication
  • Language
  • Miscellaneous
  • Networks
  • Online marketing
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful tools

  • Search blog

    Archives
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007

  • Powered by WordPress