<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s wrong with asking for unsolicited applications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-asking-for-unsolicited-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-asking-for-unsolicited-applications/</link>
	<description>THE blog for copywriters and communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Tod</title>
		<link>http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-asking-for-unsolicited-applications/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/?p=108#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, 'open' sounds much better. 'Speculative applications' is used quite a bit in the UK, but as well as being a bit of a mouthful, I think it sounds old-fashioned. I vote for 'open'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, &#8216;open&#8217; sounds much better. &#8216;Speculative applications&#8217; is used quite a bit in the UK, but as well as being a bit of a mouthful, I think it sounds old-fashioned. I vote for &#8216;open&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-asking-for-unsolicited-applications/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eye-for-image.com/blog/?p=108#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Surely "open application" is the most obvious choice? It is certainly widespread here in Finland, and I am sure is well understood globally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely &#8220;open application&#8221; is the most obvious choice? It is certainly widespread here in Finland, and I am sure is well understood globally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
